<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vacuum Supply Blog &#187; software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vacuumsupplyonline.com/category/software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vacuumsupplyonline.com</link>
	<description>Hard to find parts for hard sucking vacuums.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Distributed Parallel Fault Tolerant File System Wanted</title>
		<link>http://feeds.zawodny.com/~r/jzawodn/rss2/~3/3rKGek4YH3E/011225.html</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.zawodny.com/~r/jzawodn/rss2/~3/3rKGek4YH3E/011225.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy@Zawodny.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallel fault tolerant file systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POSIX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">11225@http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After re-thinking and re-tooling some of the work I've been doing
to take advantage of <a href="http://www.gearman.org/">Gearman</a>,
I've started to wish for a big file system in the sky.  I guess it's
no surprise that Google uses GFS with their Map/Reduce jobs and that
Hadoop has HDFS as a major piece of its infrastructure.</p>

<p>The Wikipedia page <a href="">List of file systems</a> has a
section
on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_file_systems#Distributed_parallel_fault_tolerant_file_systems">Distributed
parallel fault tolerant file systems</a> that appears to be a good
list of what's out there.  The problem, of course, is that it's
little more than a list.</p>

<p>Do you have any experience with one or more of those?
Recommendations?</p>

<p>I should say that I'm only interested in something that's Open
Source and have a minor bias against big Java things as well as stuff
that appear as though it would cease to exist if a single company went
out of business.</p>

<p>I'm not <em>too</em> worried about POSIX compliance.  The main use
would be for writing large files that other machines or processes
would then read all or part of.  I don't need updates.  The ability to
append would probably be nice, but that's easy to work around.</p>

<p>More specifically, these three have my eye at the moment:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://kosmosfs.wiki.sourceforge.net/">CloudStore (was KFS)</a> by Kosmix, a C++ clone of GFS</li>
<li><a href="http://www.danga.com/mogilefs/">MogileFS</a> from Danga, what can I say--I'm a Perl guy</li>
<li><a href="http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_design.html">HDFS</a> the <a href="http://hadoop.apache.org/">Hadoop</a> file system</li>
</ul>

<p>It's interesting that some solutions deal with blocks (often large)
while others deal with files.  I'm not sure I have a preference for
either at the moment.</p>

<p>But I'm open to hearing about everything, so speak up! :-)</p>  <p>(<a href="http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/011225.html#comments">comments</a>)</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After re-thinking and re-tooling some of the work I've been doing
to take advantage of <a href="http://www.gearman.org/">Gearman</a>,
I've started to wish for a big file system in the sky.  I guess it's
no surprise that Google uses GFS with their Map/Reduce jobs and that
Hadoop has HDFS as a major piece of its infrastructure.</p>

<p>The Wikipedia page <a href="http://feeds.zawodny.com/~r/jzawodn/rss2/~3/3rKGek4YH3E/011225.html">List of file systems</a> has a
section
on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_file_systems#Distributed_parallel_fault_tolerant_file_systems">Distributed
parallel fault tolerant file systems</a> that appears to be a good
list of what's out there.  The problem, of course, is that it's
little more than a list.</p>

<p>Do you have any experience with one or more of those?
Recommendations?</p>

<p>I should say that I'm only interested in something that's Open
Source and have a minor bias against big Java things as well as stuff
that appear as though it would cease to exist if a single company went
out of business.</p>

<p>I'm not <em>too</em> worried about POSIX compliance.  The main use
would be for writing large files that other machines or processes
would then read all or part of.  I don't need updates.  The ability to
append would probably be nice, but that's easy to work around.</p>

<p>More specifically, these three have my eye at the moment:</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://kosmosfs.wiki.sourceforge.net/">CloudStore (was KFS)</a> by Kosmix, a C++ clone of GFS</li>
<li><a href="http://www.danga.com/mogilefs/">MogileFS</a> from Danga, what can I say--I'm a Perl guy</li>
<li><a href="http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/current/hdfs_design.html">HDFS</a> the <a href="http://hadoop.apache.org/">Hadoop</a> file system</li>
</ul>

<p>It's interesting that some solutions deal with blocks (often large)
while others deal with files.  I'm not sure I have a preference for
either at the moment.</p>

<p>But I'm open to hearing about everything, so speak up! :-)</p> <p>(<a href="http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/011225.html#comments">comments</a>)</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/jzawodn/rss2/~4/3rKGek4YH3E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://feeds.zawodny.com/~r/jzawodn/rss2/~3/3rKGek4YH3E/011225.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
